@SlimBoyFat: Read the booklets on the link provided before you criticize others. The first one was published in 1881. The others listed at the bottom of the link cover the next few decades. There were many who were keeping track of Russell's scams (like miracle wheat) during his career.
Russell sued one of the authors for libel. He tried to avoid defending himself in court. One of the booklets lists some of the questioning and testimony from Russell where he was caught in lie after lie. Many were eager for this stuff to come out in court so he could be exposed. If these transcripts are true, then he is a consummate liar; a defining characteristic of sociopaths.
Excerpt:
The High Court opened on March 1st, 1913, and the case came before the Grand Jury for considera- tion. The only evidence that was in was obtained from "Pastor" Russell himself under cross-examina- tion. After comparing the charges made in the leaf- let with the evidence thus obtained, the jury found absolutely no ground for libel and handed down the ^rdict "no bill." Thus the case was thrown out of court by the evidence furnished by "Pastor" Russell himself.
I don't think you understand the significance of this material. The booklets are nothing short of explosive IMHO.
This was not a good man. The conclusions I draw are appropriate with the material provided in that link. Read the booklets and draw your own conclusions.